tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2222630007427380394.post6217770158839523013..comments2023-12-20T04:18:41.617-06:00Comments on The Hunting of the Snark: The Way The World Should BeSusan of Texashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00076915322771385454noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2222630007427380394.post-23649340225796893082011-01-03T16:17:20.249-06:002011-01-03T16:17:20.249-06:00Or too terrified--after Tom Levenson's post sp...Or too terrified--after Tom Levenson's post sparked a blogswarm of support for Warren. (It's Day 165 in the Countdown To Doom!)<br /><br />She promised to explain Warren's paternalism as well. I was so looking forward to it. <br /><br />But her latest (on why <i>your</i> facts are really opinions and <i>her</i> opinions are really facts) looks very promising.Susan of Texashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00076915322771385454noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2222630007427380394.post-56133092938506691252011-01-03T16:02:54.725-06:002011-01-03T16:02:54.725-06:00I re-read part of Megan's post on Warren, and ...I re-read part of Megan's post on Warren, and the <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2010/07/considering-elizabeth-warren-the-scholar/60211/" rel="nofollow">first paragraph</a> seems to imply the elusive 'part 2 of 2' was already written and ready to go. <br /><br />Julian Assange, can you look into this? I'm curious to read something so mean, petty and dishonest that even McArdle was too ashamed to post it.Dillonnoreply@blogger.com