tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2222630007427380394.post7543959400264159906..comments2023-12-20T04:18:41.617-06:00Comments on The Hunting of the Snark: Megan Explains HerselfSusan of Texashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00076915322771385454noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2222630007427380394.post-7252097408104218152008-10-17T08:54:00.000-05:002008-10-17T08:54:00.000-05:00Yes, the parsing is especially cute. The whole thi...Yes, the parsing is especially cute. The whole thing is a work of art.Susan of Texashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00076915322771385454noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2222630007427380394.post-15496454557968041852008-10-16T13:58:00.000-05:002008-10-16T13:58:00.000-05:00Oh why did you make me read it? Me so filthy. I lo...Oh why did you make me read it? Me so filthy. I love this bit <BR/><BR/>"So the idea that Krugman has somehow won one for the team by predicting something that libertarian/conservative/free-market commentators didn't see coming is either misinformed, or lunatic"<BR/><BR/>just so she can deflect even more criticism that she is crap (in my ever so short love affair with her 'writing').<BR/><BR/>No suggestion that the Right wanted to string up Krugman, continually called him unhinged, wrong and a dunderhead and continues to do so; rather she is suggesting he was only partially right so therefore still sucky. <BR/><BR/>I love it; the parsing is worth some praise at least, if it is ruthlessly and transparently dishonest in the end. Well done Megs!! Off the spa with you now!MikeGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16695202399894827221noreply@blogger.com