tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2222630007427380394.post3561634907416948624..comments2023-12-20T04:18:41.617-06:00Comments on The Hunting of the Snark: That Post Does Not Mean What You Think It MeansSusan of Texashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00076915322771385454noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2222630007427380394.post-65688722364846097532008-08-18T13:47:00.000-05:002008-08-18T13:47:00.000-05:00Writing about things when she doesn't have a clue ...Writing about things when she doesn't have a clue seems to be Megan's adopted niche, even if she doesn't know it herself. <BR/><BR/>As you've pointed out before, why wouldn't Megan -as a paid journalist - possibly approach the issue by interviewing religious leaders for their thoughts on the subject or what not? Hell, at least e-mail one of those nuts at the National Review or World Net Daily for a comment or something. <BR/><BR/>Not only are matters of faith and governance two totally separate issues for me, it's actually pretty damn important that they remain that way in a country that's supposed to be religiously pluralistic.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2222630007427380394.post-61813881506658532192008-08-18T13:10:00.000-05:002008-08-18T13:10:00.000-05:00I can't believe it's this hard to understand. And ...I can't believe it's this hard to understand. And why would a person need to vague up "agnostic"? And how can someone who's obviously never spent five minutes thinking about theology have the gall to discuss it in a public forum? <BR/><BR/>So many questions, so little to work with.Susan of Texashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00076915322771385454noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2222630007427380394.post-37746848435702323102008-08-18T11:28:00.000-05:002008-08-18T11:28:00.000-05:00Wow. "Not very bright" is an understatement. Meg...Wow. "Not very bright" is an understatement. Megs doesn't understand how someone can separate their politics from their faith? Here's an example to start with: I personally think abortion is wrong and wouldn't have one. I do, however, think other people are entitled to draw different conclusions based on their own circumstances and therefore think the procedure should be legal. <BR/><BR/>Is that so hard to understand? Sigh. At least she spelled "skeptical" right in this post, instead of using the British spelling like in the last post you quoted.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com