I have to run so this will be too short. This is working out far better than I thought. Instead of finding valid academic reasons to support her (wrong) views, Megan is now attacking instead. Yeah, sure, maybe Krugman and Roubini were right, but were they right for the right reasons? Huh? Huh? Or were they "monkeys throwing darts" and finally getting a bulls-eye?
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
I refuse to click that link on general principle, but I think I get the point. When Megan realized she was wrong about Iraq, she wrote something similar to make herself feel better.
Wasn;t she just complaining that she didn't get Krugman's math?
RB--that was yesterday. She can't be humble forever, you know.
Dillon, you'd think she would start to learn, but then she wouldn't be our Megan if she did that.
Post a Comment