Paul Krugman clarifies his point about temporary versus permanent spending:Tyler's latest on temporary versus permanent government consumption clarifies what the confusion is over my very simple point. I don't think Tyler understands what I (and everybody else) means by government spending. I don't mean the government handing someone a rebate check; I mean the government actually, you know, buying something -- say, building a bridge.
Oh, Megan. Megan, Megan, Megan. What will we do with you? Besides mocking, of couse. No, Megan. Krugman is not clarifying his point. He's clarifying your confusion. Your wrongness. Your lack of right.
How dishonest can a person be?